Lady refuses to leave her 108-year-old Farmhouse.
Edith Macefield was a remarkable woman who became a symbol of resistance against relentless development and the unwavering value of personal history and connection to one’s home. In 2006, she garnered international attention when she refused a staggering $1 million offer to sell her small, 108-year-old farmhouse in the Ballard neighborhood of Seattle, Washington, to make way for a commercial development.
Edith Macefield passed away in 2008 at the age of 86. In her will, she left her house to Martin, a testament to their friendship and her appreciation for his kindness.
A nail house in Zhengzhou, China taken in 2021
House in Guangxi, China
Sitting at the middle of the road in Gunagxi province taken in April, 2021. Reports claim that the owner did not reach an agreement with the local authorities.
The Haizhuyong Bridge.
The Haizhuyong Bridge, located on Huandao Road in Guangzhou City, has been opened to traffic. However, the middle section of the road is divided into two due to “nail houses” where negotiations with the homeowners were unsuccessful. This unique urban landscape has caused a frenzy on social media. Photo enthusiasts from around the world are flocking to capture images of the houses, now surrounded by massive concrete structures, earning the nickname “Eye of the Pearl of the Sea.”
Relevant authorities claim that the negotiation fees were too high, forcing them to abandon talks and proceed with the project. However, the homeowners argue that no consensus was reached regarding the resettlement sites, stating that the houses offered to them were located near a morgue.
“Urban development often clashes with personal property rights, leading to situations where homeowners resist relocation,” says Dr. Li Ming, an urban planning expert. “The case of the Haizhuyong Bridge is a stark reminder of the complexities involved in balancing progress with individual rights.”
Millionare refuses to leave his $16 million house that could fall into the ocean.
In the picturesque coastal town of Dana Point, California, a dramatic scene unfolds. A $16 million mansion, once a symbol of luxury and serenity, now teeters precariously on the edge of a cliff ravaged by recent heavy rains.
The landslide triggered by the downpours significantly eroded the cliff face, leaving the mansion dangerously close to the ocean’s grasp. While the house itself hasn’t suffered structural damage yet, the situation remains unstable and could worsen with further erosion.
The homeowner, Dr. Lewis Bruggeman, has made a bold decision: he refuses to leave his home despite the city’s warnings. He maintains that the house is safe, and the landslide hasn’t compromised its foundation.
City officials, however, paint a different picture. They acknowledge that there’s no immediate threat, but emphasize the potential for rapid change with further rain or erosion. They closely monitor the situation and urge Dr. Bruggeman to consider leaving for his safety.
This incident serves as a stark reminder of the increasing risks associated with coastal erosion, particularly in the face of climate change and rising sea levels. It raises crucial questions about the responsibility of homeowners and local authorities in managing such risks, and the delicate balance between property rights and individual safety.
The future of the mansion remains uncertain. Dr. Bruggeman’s unwavering stance adds an element of suspense and potential danger. The city will likely continue its close monitoring, and may need to take further action if the risk of collapse escalates.
